MyDeveloperDay added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/docs/ClangFormatStyleOptions.rst:3649
``SBPO_ControlStatementsExceptForEachMacros`` remains an alias for
backward compatibility.
----------------
Now I look back here, why where these Macro considered the same as for loops?
why would we want
```
for (....)
Q_FOREACH(...)
```
So this really does need a struct or we'll be eventually be adding
`SBPO_ControlStatementsAndFunctionDefinitionsExceptControlMacrosButNotIfAndDefinatelyWhilesAndSometimesSwitchButOnlyOnTheSecondThursdayOfTheMonth`
```
SpaceBeforeParen:
AfterFunctionDefinitionName: false
AfterFunctionDeclarationName: true
AfterSwitch: true
AfterForeachMacros: false
.... (there are likely others)
```
`
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D110833/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D110833
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
