aco added a comment. Hi, first of all I want to say that the name "HeaderFilterRegex" is a bit ambiguous, we don't know intuitively if we define what is filtered or what passes.
in my humble opinion alexfh's proposal would be much easier to use than 2 regex. In D34654#3022728 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D34654#3022728>, @alexfh wrote: > would a header glob list (similar to how the format of the `-checks=` flag) > be enough for the use cases folks have? For me yes it's enough, and will be welcome. Repository: rL LLVM CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D34654/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D34654 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
