anirudhp added a comment. In D109362#2999688 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D109362#2999688>, @uweigand wrote:
> Looking at the common code parts, it seems the behavior of MM_GOFF is > actually identical to MM_ELF. Is this correct? If so, do we really need a > different format type here? At a future point, we will be changing the local and global prefixes. At that point we would still need a separate `MM_GOFF` field. I feel it would be a bit better to enforce it from now itself. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D109362/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D109362 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
