catenacyber added a comment. Thanks for the quick reply
> I don't think this change is responsible. This has been tested by many C++ > downstream groups. What did I do wrong ? Adding this only commit makes the scenario fail. > Rust should use upgrade its lib/ProfileData and compiler-rt/lib/profile, and > not mix raw profile files at different commits. I am not sure I understand. What are raw profiles ? In my scenario, only `llvm-profdata` acts on default.profraw And before that, the linker, not the rust compiler, mixes together the different coverage sections... So, how would Rust mix raw profiles ? > The binary ID change has caused a bit of churn to ProfileData but it is > unrelated to this patch. Well, there may be other bugs, but this is not a problem in my scenario... Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D104556/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D104556 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
