kamleshbhalui added a comment. In D108421#2958848 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D108421#2958848>, @MaskRay wrote:
> If you read the comment in TargetMachine::shouldAssumeDSOLocal: this is the > wrong direction. dso_local is assumed to be marked by the frontend. > > Direct accesses and GOT accesses are trade-offs. Direct accesses are not > always preferred. The MachO special case is an unfortunate case for their xnu > kernel, not a good example here. @MaskRay I would like to know more about these trade-offs details, any supporting documents will do. Considering below testcase, can you shed some light how code generated by llc-12 is better than llc-11 for given testcase? https://godbolt.org/z/x9xojWb58 And FYI this testcase does not work when build as Linux Kernel Module. LKM loader throw error("Unknown rela relocation: 42")? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D108421/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D108421 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
