cor3ntin added a comment. In D106215#2943611 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D106215#2943611>, @aaron.ballman wrote:
> I think that C and C++ should behave the same here; at least, I don't see any > reason why they should have different capabilities. I agree but as WG14 hasn't weighted in I didn't want to make that call. What do you think? > The paper said that there is no expected code breakage from this change, but > have you tried building a diverse corpus of code (like a distro's worth of > packages) under this patch to see if anything actually breaks in practice? (I > don't expect breakage that isn't identifying an actual issue in the code, but > having some verification would be appreciated.) This would also help to > identify whether the change is appropriate for C as well. We have done regexes over various repositories (every vcpkg package) with no match. Not running a complete compiler Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D106215/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D106215 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
