RKSimon added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D20528#437117, @mkuper wrote:
> Sorry, I didn't intend to imply the rest of the llvm work is necessary for > this to go in. Just that I'd be happier with this patch knowing that we have > a regression test for doing the (shuffle + fpext, say) lowering correctly. I > didn't even mean fast-isel, only the DAG. The fast-isel tests are the most self contained (and are useful to show the non-optimized codegen for every intrinsic in the headers). I can submit them now if you wish. Repository: rL LLVM http://reviews.llvm.org/D20528 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
