JonChesterfield added a comment.

In D107492#2926910 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D107492#2926910>, @tra wrote:

> In D107492#2926871 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D107492#2926871>, 
> @JonChesterfield wrote:
>
>> Therefore I'd like to leave it as `__asm__ volatile`.
>
> Being the one who introduced inconsistent use of `__volatile__` and 
> `volatile` in this header, I'm pretty sure that PTX's notion of volatile is 
> not involved for inline asm of `trap` and `brkpt`. It should be fine changing 
> them to `__volatile__` for the sake of uniformity. 
> Up to you.

Ah, I had missed that we already had an instance of `__volatile__`. We have one 
`__volatile__` and three `volatile`. I like consistency and it seems you would 
prefer '__' to '', will patch that at the same time.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D107492/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D107492

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to