ArcsinX added a comment. In D107304#2926310 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D107304#2926310>, @sammccall wrote:
> Clang's current answer is "yes we are GCC >=4, but no we are not GCC >=5". > This causes the codebase to reject the compiler, because it relies on > features/absence of bugs from GCC 5. @ArcSinX any idea what these are, > concretely? The checks about GCC version that I saw were related with some features from C++ standard that GCC < 4.X.Y doesn't support and there was a try to implement these features for GCC < 4.X.Y, but clang has these features and some kind of conflict appears. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D107304/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D107304 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
