sammccall marked an inline comment as done.
sammccall added inline comments.


================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/GlobalCompilationDatabase.cpp:288
   };
-  for (const auto &Entry : {CDBFile{&CompileCommandsJson, parseJSON},
-                            CDBFile{&BuildCompileCommandsJson, parseJSON},
-                            CDBFile{&CompileFlagsTxt, parseFixed}}) {
+  CDBFile Files[] = {
+      {&CompileCommandsJson, parseJSON},
----------------
kadircet wrote:
> kadircet wrote:
> > nit: I'd make it `static const` just to make sure they are not going away 
> > this time + it will save up some stack space.
> > 
> > nit: Maybe also get rid of the struct's name ? (`static const struct { ... 
> > } Files[] = { ... };`)
> as discussed, `CachedFile` entries are actually pointers to members, so NVM 
> the `static`.
There are pointers to members in here! The fact that `static const` even 
compiles is a massive footgun :-(
We should write a clang-tidy check for that.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D106654/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D106654

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to