aaron.ballman added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/include/clang/AST/Decl.h:1993
const DeclarationNameInfo &NameInfo, QualType T,
- TypeSourceInfo *TInfo, StorageClass S, bool isInlineSpecified,
- ConstexprSpecKind ConstexprKind,
+ TypeSourceInfo *TInfo, StorageClass S, bool UsesFPIntrin,
+ bool isInlineSpecified, ConstexprSpecKind ConstexprKind,
----------------
I have no idea if others agree, but I have a slight preference for putting
`UsesFPIntrin` towards the end of the parameter list (here and in the Create
methods) -- this flag seems less important than the constexpr kind or whether
inline is specified (and, it helpfully avoids putting two `bool` parameters
next to one another).
If you agree, perhaps it could be moved to before `TrailingRequiresClause`?
================
Comment at: clang/include/clang/AST/Decl.h:2598
+ /// Determine whether the function was declared in source context
+ /// that requires constrained FP intrinsics
+ bool UsesFPIntrin() const { return FunctionDeclBits.UsesFPIntrin; }
----------------
================
Comment at: clang/include/clang/AST/Decl.h:2602
+ /// Set whether the function was declared in source context
+ /// that requires constrained FP intrinsics
+ void setUsesFPIntrin(bool I) { FunctionDeclBits.UsesFPIntrin = I; }
----------------
================
Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.cpp:939
+ llvm::RoundingMode RM = getLangOpts().getFPRoundingMode();
+ auto fpExceptionBehavior =
+ ToConstrainedExceptMD(getLangOpts().getFPExceptionMode());
----------------
Please spell out the type rather than use `auto`, also, should probably be `FP`
rather than `fp` per the usual naming conventions.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenFunction.cpp:700
CurCodeDecl = D;
- if (const auto *FD = dyn_cast_or_null<FunctionDecl>(D))
- if (FD->usesSEHTry())
- CurSEHParent = FD;
+ const FunctionDecl *FD = dyn_cast_or_null<FunctionDecl>(D);
+ if (FD && FD->usesSEHTry())
----------------
mibintc wrote:
> there's a whole bunch of places in this func that creates FD, I changed them
> into a single place. hope that's OK, or i could pull it out as a pre-patch if
> you prefer
I think it'd be better to separate these changes into an NFC patch (feel free
to land it without review; I've checked the changes here and they look correct
and NFC).
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D102343/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D102343
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
