efriedma added a comment. I'm confused what your goal here is, exactly. The point of allowing 512-bit inline asm operands is presumably to allow writing efficient code involving inline asm... but you're intentionally destroying any potential efficiency by forcing it to be passed/returned in memory. If the user wanted to do that, they could just use an "m" constraint.
It looks like SelectionDAG currently crashes if you try to pass an array as an inline asm operand, but that should be possible to fix, I think. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D94098/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D94098 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
