steveire added a comment. In D69764#2863266 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69764#2863266>, @aaron.ballman wrote:
> In D69764#2863213 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69764#2863213>, @steveire wrote: > >> @MyDeveloperDay Does anything prevent this being merged, instead of just >> rebased? > > Please see my comments from https://reviews.llvm.org/D69764#2533538. A clang-tidy check will never be as fast as clang-query. Anyway, you're against merging this, but there are clearly many people who prefer to see it merged. Can we merge it? CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D69764/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D69764 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
