nikic added a comment.
Maybe send a mail to cfe-dev to solicit some help with the opaque pointer
migration on the clang side?
================
Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/Address.h:29-30
public:
Address(llvm::Value *pointer, CharUnits alignment)
- : Pointer(pointer), Alignment(alignment) {
+ : Address(pointer, nullptr, alignment) {}
+ Address(llvm::Value *pointer, llvm::Type *PointeeType, CharUnits alignment)
----------------
dblaikie wrote:
> At some point will this include an assertion that 'pointer' isn't a
> PointerType? I guess some uses of PointerTyped values won't need to know
> their pointee type?
>
> (or are all values in Address PointerTyped? (owing to them being
> "addresses"))?
Based on the unconditional cast in getType(), I'd assume that addresses are
always pointer typed.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D103465/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D103465
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
