jrtc27 added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/CommonArgs.cpp:633
+ // pass more options in specific target
+ switch (ToolChain.getArch()) {
----------------
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/CommonArgs.cpp:634-638
+ switch (ToolChain.getArch()) {
+ default:
+ break;
+ case llvm::Triple::riscv32:
+ case llvm::Triple::riscv64: {
----------------
ToolChain.getArch().isRISCV()? No need for a switch until there are other
architectures that need code here too.
================
Comment at: clang/test/Driver/lto.c:126
+// RUN: %clang -target riscv32-unknown-linux-gnu %s -fuse-ld=gold -flto \
+// RUN: -mabi=ilp32f -### 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=RISCV-SPEC-ABI-1
+// RUN: %clang -target riscv32-unknown-linux-gnu %s -fuse-ld=gold -flto \
----------------
Give these meaningful names
================
Comment at: clang/test/Driver/lto.c:134-137
+// RISCV-SPEC-ABI-1: "-plugin-opt=-target-abi=ilp32f"
+// RISCV-SPEC-ABI-2: "-plugin-opt=-target-abi=ilp32d"
+// RISCV-SPEC-ABI-3: "-plugin-opt=-target-abi=lp64"
+// RISCV-SPEC-ABI-4: "-plugin-opt=-target-abi=lp64f"
----------------
Why this set without ilp32 and lp64d, two of the four most common ABIs?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D71387/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D71387
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
