Quuxplusone requested changes to this revision. Quuxplusone added a comment. This revision now requires changes to proceed.
Step 1 should be to find out if this is even a problem at all. For example, try using one of these tools to compile a C++ program against GNU libstdc++, or against a library like range-v3, both of which already uses many small detail headers. Is the tool's output confusing or incorrect for //those// libraries? Only if it's actually a problem, should Clang itself try to solve problems with those tool/library combos by adding special-case code into the Clang codebase. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D105439/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D105439 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
