Woops. I was incorrect. It seems that user defined "operator&" overloads
can be found in the constructor. From the LWG issue:
> Note that {i,o}stream_type are specializations of basic_{i,o}stream, but
the constructors might still pick up an overloaded & via the traits
template parameter.
At least that also tells us how to test it.
/Eric
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Eric Fiselier <e...@efcs.ca> wrote:
> The difference between "operator&" and "addressof" is inconsequential
> when user defined overloads of "operator&" can't be found, which is the
> case for the changes in the stream iterator constructors. We might as well
> keep it consistent though. I don't see any value changing it back to use
> "operator&" in either the library or the standard.
>
> /Eric
>
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 2:02 PM, David Blaikie <dblai...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If some parts are not testable & as you say, not meaningful, then it
>> seems OK to just not implement them & file a DR on the standard, no?
>>
>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 1:00 PM, Eric Fiselier <e...@efcs.ca> wrote:
>>
>>> I added a test for operator->() in r269812. Marshall and I discussed
>>> offline about how not all parts of this change are testable (and hence not
>>> meaningful) but that's what the standard says to do.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 1:51 PM, David Blaikie via cfe-commits <
>>> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Test coverage?
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 10:44 AM, Marshall Clow via cfe-commits <
>>>> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Author: marshall
>>>>> Date: Tue May 17 12:44:40 2016
>>>>> New Revision: 269789
>>>>>
>>>>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=269789&view=rev
>>>>> Log:
>>>>> Implement LWG2576: istream_iterator and ostream_iterator should use
>>>>> std::addressof
>>>>>
>>>>> Modified:
>>>>> libcxx/trunk/include/iterator
>>>>> libcxx/trunk/www/cxx1z_status.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Modified: libcxx/trunk/include/iterator
>>>>> URL:
>>>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/include/iterator?rev=269789&r1=269788&r2=269789&view=diff
>>>>>
>>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>>> --- libcxx/trunk/include/iterator (original)
>>>>> +++ libcxx/trunk/include/iterator Tue May 17 12:44:40 2016
>>>>> @@ -772,14 +772,14 @@ private:
>>>>> _Tp __value_;
>>>>> public:
>>>>> _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY _LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR istream_iterator() :
>>>>> __in_stream_(0), __value_() {}
>>>>> - _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY istream_iterator(istream_type& __s) :
>>>>> __in_stream_(&__s)
>>>>> + _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY istream_iterator(istream_type& __s) :
>>>>> __in_stream_(_VSTD::addressof(__s))
>>>>> {
>>>>> if (!(*__in_stream_ >> __value_))
>>>>> __in_stream_ = 0;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY const _Tp& operator*() const {return
>>>>> __value_;}
>>>>> - _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY const _Tp* operator->() const {return
>>>>> &(operator*());}
>>>>> + _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY const _Tp* operator->() const {return
>>>>> _VSTD::addressof((operator*()));}
>>>>> _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY istream_iterator& operator++()
>>>>> {
>>>>> if (!(*__in_stream_ >> __value_))
>>>>> @@ -811,9 +811,9 @@ private:
>>>>> const char_type* __delim_;
>>>>> public:
>>>>> _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY ostream_iterator(ostream_type& __s)
>>>>> - : __out_stream_(&__s), __delim_(0) {}
>>>>> + : __out_stream_(_VSTD::addressof(__s)), __delim_(0) {}
>>>>> _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY ostream_iterator(ostream_type& __s,
>>>>> const _CharT* __delimiter)
>>>>> - : __out_stream_(&__s), __delim_(__delimiter) {}
>>>>> + : __out_stream_(_VSTD::addressof(__s)), __delim_(__delimiter)
>>>>> {}
>>>>> _LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY ostream_iterator& operator=(const _Tp&
>>>>> __value_)
>>>>> {
>>>>> *__out_stream_ << __value_;
>>>>>
>>>>> Modified: libcxx/trunk/www/cxx1z_status.html
>>>>> URL:
>>>>> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/www/cxx1z_status.html?rev=269789&r1=269788&r2=269789&view=diff
>>>>>
>>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>>> --- libcxx/trunk/www/cxx1z_status.html (original)
>>>>> +++ libcxx/trunk/www/cxx1z_status.html Tue May 17 12:44:40 2016
>>>>> @@ -222,7 +222,7 @@
>>>>> <tr><td><a href="
>>>>> http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2572";>2572</a></td><td>The
>>>>> remarks for <tt>shared_ptr::operator*</tt> should apply to
>>>>> <i>cv</i>-qualified <tt>void</tt> as
>>>>> well</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
>>>>> <tr><td><a href="
>>>>> http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2574";>2574</a></td><td>[fund.ts.v2]
>>>>> <tt>std::experimental::function::operator=(F&&)</tt> should be
>>>>> constrained</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
>>>>> <tr><td><a href="
>>>>> http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2575";>2575</a></td><td>[fund.ts.v2]
>>>>> <tt>experimental::function::assign</tt> should be
>>>>> removed</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
>>>>> - <tr><td><a href="
>>>>> http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2576";>2576</a></td><td><tt>istream_iterator</tt>
>>>>> and <tt>ostream_iterator</tt> should use
>>>>> <tt>std::addressof</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td></td></tr>
>>>>> + <tr><td><a href="
>>>>> http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2576";>2576</a></td><td><tt>istream_iterator</tt>
>>>>> and <tt>ostream_iterator</tt> should use
>>>>> <tt>std::addressof</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
>>>>> <tr><td><a href="
>>>>> http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2577";>2577</a></td><td><tt>{shared,unique}_lock</tt>
>>>>> should use
>>>>> <tt>std::addressof</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
>>>>> <tr><td><a href="
>>>>> http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2579";>2579</a></td><td>Inconsistency
>>>>> wrt Allocators in <tt>basic_string</tt> assignment vs.
>>>>> <tt>basic_string::assign</tt></td><td>Jacksonville</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
>>>>> <tr><td><a href="
>>>>> http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-defects.html#2581";>2581</a></td><td>Specialization
>>>>> of <tt><type_traits></tt> variable templates should be
>>>>> prohibited</td><td>Jacksonville</td><td>Complete</td></tr>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> cfe-commits mailing list
>>>>> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
>>>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> cfe-commits mailing list
>>>> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
>>>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
