Quuxplusone added a comment.

@hans: FYI, that looks related to the immediately following D99005 
<https://reviews.llvm.org/D99005>, not D99696 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D99696> 
specifically. I suspect that reverting D99005 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D99005> 
(but leaving D99696 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D99696> in trunk) would suffice 
to fix that symptom. But I agree I don't see why it should be happening. That 
block code looks reasonable to me at first glance and wasn't intended to be 
affected by D99005 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D99005> AFAIK.
@mizvekov: See why I'm skeptical about merging big patches back-to-back and/or 
on Fridays? ;)

Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D99696/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D99696

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to