vsavchenko added a comment. In D103314#2810795 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D103314#2810795>, @martong wrote:
> I have the first measurements results in the attached zip file. The file > contains the html file generated by csa-testbench. It's name contains `CTU` > but actually it was a regular non-CTU analysis. The most interesting is > probably the run-times, where we can notice a small increase: > F17327338: image.png <https://reviews.llvm.org/F17327338> > Other than that, the number of the warnings seems to be unchanged. The most > notable change in the statistics is in the number of paths explored by the > analyzer: in some cases (e.g. twin) it increased with 2-3 %. F17327375: > CTU_20results_20on_20open_20projects_201.zip > <https://reviews.llvm.org/F17327375> This sounds amazing! Great job! Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D103314/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D103314 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
