Quuxplusone added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaStmt.cpp:3226-3227
+ CopyElisionSemanticsKind CESK = CES_Strict;
+ if (getLangOpts().CPlusPlus20) {
+ CESK = CES_ImplicitlyMovableCXX20;
+ } else if (getLangOpts().CPlusPlus11) {
----------------
rsmith wrote:
> P1825 was accepted as a Defect Report (see
> https://wiki.edg.com/bin/view/Wg21cologne2019/StrawPolls); is there a reason
> we're not applying this retroactively?
> Move to accept the changes in P1825R0 (Merged wording for P0527R1 and
> P1155R3) as a Defect Report and apply them to the C++ working paper.
Yipes. @rsmith, is the intent that modern compilers should support
```
std::unique_ptr<int> from_rvalue(std::unique_ptr<int>&& x) { return x; }
```
in `-std=c++11` mode? Are Clang, GCC, MSVC, EDG all on the same page here? If
so, awesome. I just find it a priori unlikely that we got informed consensus on
that.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D88220/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D88220
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
