MaskRay added a comment. In D102090#2745331 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D102090#2745331>, @tstellar wrote:
> Does this change mean that LD_PRELOAD will no longer work? Are there any > other downsides to adding these flags? The downside is that it will behave more like Windows dll and Mach-O dylib using two-level namespace lookup. No runtime preemption. LD_PRELOAD will not work. It probably never works properly: replacing a program linked with libLLVM-11.so with a different libLLVM-11.so version at runtime? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D102090/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D102090 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
