xbolva00 added a comment. In D101598#2729865 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D101598#2729865>, @ldionne wrote:
> Just for posterity, what we discussed is that since there is a list of > addressable functions in the standard, we should explore adding a warning to > Clang that fires whenever somebody takes the address of a function in > namespace `std`, except if it's an addressable function. That list would > either be maintained explicitly in Clang, or, preferably, we'd have an > attribute that we can mark addressable functions with so that the compiler > doesn't flag those specific functions. > > I'm not sure whether that is actually a good approach, but I told @cjdb that > from the library perspective, I was more comfortable with marking a few > functions with that attribute than marking basically everything in the > library with `[[noaddress]]`. Maybe opportunity to rework https://reviews.llvm.org/D58882 :) Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D101598/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D101598 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
