Anastasia added a comment. In D101043#2708358 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D101043#2708358>, @yaxunl wrote:
> Did you check whether this patch will cause regression in OpenCL conformance > tests? If not, I am OK with it. This change has no impact on CTS as CTS has never had negative compiler tests i.e. checking that the compiler rejects certain kernels. This change doesn't break existing kernels i.e. it only allows to compile extra kernels i.e. without the use of pragmas enable/disable when non-native compiler types or functions are called. CTS only mainly uses `#pragma OPENCL EXTENSION * : enable` and there is only one occurrence of `#pragma OPENCL EXTENSION * : disable` that only checks that the pragmas are accepted, there are no other relevant checks in the tests. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D101043/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D101043 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
