jdoerfert added a comment. In D100514#2696106 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D100514#2696106>, @cchen wrote:
>> Initially we did not have an OMPIRBuilder object unconditionally, now we >> have. Let's move over everything that is ready. So master and critical >> should be good to go as well I suppose. > > While using OMPIRBuilder as default, do we want to just remove codegen in > Clang or we have a flag for using Clang codegen? No duplication where it is not necessary. So if the OMPIRBuilder is fully capable use it remove the clang codegen, please. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D100514/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D100514 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
