benshi001 added a comment.

In D97669#2688771 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D97669#2688771>, @Anastasia wrote:
> In D97669#2687419 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D97669#2687419>, @benshi001 wrote:
>
>> In D97669#2685698 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D97669#2685698>, @Anastasia 
>> wrote:
>>
>>> In D97669#2678460 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D97669#2678460>, @benshi001 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In D97669#2676826 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D97669#2676826>, @Anastasia 
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In D97669#2665865 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D97669#2665865>, @benshi001 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In D97669#2661560 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D97669#2661560>, @Anastasia 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is `stdio.h`  used by anything?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No. `stdio.h` is not used. But if I do `#include <avr/interrupt.h>`, 
>>>>>> then `-I /usr/lib/avr/include` must be specified in the command line 
>>>>>> option. While avr-gcc does not reqiures that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would like to keep clang & avr-gcc in the behaviour.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ok, do you plan to use it later? Then perhaps you should be adding it in 
>>>>> the subsequent patches?
>>>>
>>>> No. No future pathes are needed. The avr-libc includes standard libc 
>>>> (headers and libs) and avr specific headers and libs. This patch fixes all 
>>>> of these issues. Both standard libc and avr platform specific libs can be 
>>>> used without any explict command line option, just like avr-gcc does.
>>>
>>> Ok, so your patch is adding the following file
>>>
>>> `clang/test/Driver/Inputs/basic_avr_tree/usr/lib/avr/include/stdio.h`
>>>
>>> But it doesn't seem to be used at present? If you don't need it anywhere it 
>>> should not be added.
>>
>> No. The `stdio.h` is still needed even it is not referred by any code in 
>> current patch. It works as a placeholder for the directory 
>> `clang/test/Driver/Inputs/basic_avr_tree/usr/lib/avr/include/`, and this 
>> directory is needed in the test case `clang/test/Driver/avr-toolchain.c` of 
>> current patch, and this directory can not exist without `stdio.h`.
>
> Do you know why an empty directory is not sufficient?
>
> Overall perhaps it makes more sense if someone with more experience on AVR 
> reviews this change.

I just learnt that llvm repo uses an empty .keep file to keep an empty 
directory, so I replaced the stdio.h with a .keep. Thanks for your comments.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D97669/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D97669

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to