rsmith added a comment. In D99893#2672563 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D99893#2672563>, @cor3ntin wrote:
> This would solve some of the issues (perfect code-gen / no body > instantiation), but the declarations are still instantiated of course. > And I have a few folks asking me whether I could get rid of it. > Unfortunately, I think the goals of preserving the AST as is today and > getting rid of these template instantiations are contradictory. Do you know how much of the cost here is instantiating the function declaration, and how much is instantiating `std::remove_reference`? I imagine we could make the latter cheaper by adding a `__remove_reference` builtin and changing libc++'s `forward` and `move` to use it if that's worthwhile. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D99893/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D99893 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
