rnk added a comment. I think 1 is OK as long as we can assert that things don't get out of sync. I like the idea of putting the prefix next to the data layout string.
In the long run, splitting up Support might be reasonable, and pushing DataLayout down out of IR seems like something that could happen at that time. I would like to reduce the set of things that tablgen depends on by making Support into a smaller library of just system APIs and data structures, moving everything else out. Maybe the right way to do that is to leave Support as the ambiguous, kitchen sink library, and make a smaller, more targeted library under it. We already have the notion of the ADT library in our header structure for data structures. We used to have the System library before it was merged with Support. I think the only thing blocking this refactoring is the will to disentangle the circular dependencies. Repository: rL LLVM CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D17183/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D17183 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
