Is there a gcc option or they just assume they are targeting the
linker that was around when gcc was built?
> + if (Args.hasFlag(options::OPT_mpiecopyrelocs,
> options::OPT_mno_piecopyrelocs,
> + false)) {
> + CmdArgs.push_back("-piecopyrelocs");
> + }
you don't need the {}
> +def piecopyrelocs : Flag<["-"], "piecopyrelocs">,
> + HelpText<"Linker copy relocations support when linking as PIE">;
I think you are missing a verb: Linker copy relocations *are* supported.
But how about just "Position independent executables can have copy relocations"?
Cheers,
Rafael
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
