probinson added a comment. In D99250#2651953 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D99250#2651953>, @probinson wrote:
> In D99250#2651204 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D99250#2651204>, @dblaikie wrote: > >> Does anyone else have a DWARFv3 consumer they care about? (@aprantl and >> @probinson) >> >> Does anyone have a DWARF consumer that changes significantly based on the >> language version (I guess lldb (@aprantl can you confirm?)? I doubt gdb does >> (yeah, it just treats all C++ versions the same >> <https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=blob;f=gdb/dwarf2/read.c;h=ee6f3f7f7e14f722ec9bb6780563fa0bbbe268cc;hb=refs/heads/master#l21006>)? >> how about Sony?) > > I believe Sony is only using v4/v5 at this point. Regarding dialect > controlling debugger behavior, I think it's unlikely, as distinguishing C++ > dialects is new in v5, its adoption is pretty recent (at least for us), and > we'd want behavior to be consistent across v4/v5 as much as possible. I'll > verify that with our debugger guys. I've confirmed that our intent is not to have dialect-specific behavior. > If LLDB actually does _not_ have behavior change based on dialect, then we > might as well control language codes based on DWARF version, and the patch > should proceed. I grepped the lldb tree and found nothing... @aprantl can you confirm? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D99250/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D99250 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
