NoQ added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/Analysis/Inputs/expected-plists/edges-new.mm.plist:11413
- <key>category</key><string>Dead store</string>
+ <key>category</key><string>Unused code</string>
<key>type</key><string>Dead initialization</string>
<key>check_name</key><string>deadcode.DeadStores</string>
----------------
Charusso wrote:
> "Initialization was never used"? (Swift style:
> https://swift.godbolt.org/z/c17EMb)
That's a scan-build bugtype so it follows a different tradition. The actual
warning is a few lines above and it says "Value stored to 'foo' during its
initialization is never read".
Additionally, unlike clang or swift (which [[
https://github.com/apple/swift/blob/main/docs/Diagnostics.md | inherits the
tradition from clang ]]), static analyzer warnings are traditionally expected
to be complete sentences. So we typically won't be able to synchronize wording.
But in this case it might be possible given that the warnings already have a
similar structure. I'll think about it ^.^
Repository:
rC Clang
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D98741/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D98741
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
