hokein added a comment.

The code looks good, but I don't have a very strong opinion of making the 
resource-dir as a config option. Do we have a motivation (e.g. user request?) 
now?



================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/unittests/CompileCommandsTests.cpp:381
 } // namespace clang
-
----------------
looks like  removing the eof is an accident change?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D97935/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D97935

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
  • [PATCH] D97935: [clangd] A... Kadir Cetinkaya via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D97935: [clan... Haojian Wu via Phabricator via cfe-commits

Reply via email to