alexfh added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D19871#419947, @aaron.ballman wrote:
> Is this required for some purpose? > > I'm not keen on adding new AST matchers that we cannot expose via the dynamic > API, so I would prefer to solve that problem if we want to add this matcher. I agree that when possible, matchers should be available via the dynamic matchers API. It doesn't seem overly complicated to add this support here. As far as I understand, we just need to register the matcher in lib/ASTMatchers/Dynamic/Registry.cpp and add support for `CastKind` argument type (by adding a corresponding `ArgTypeTraits` instantiation). Etienne, can you try this? http://reviews.llvm.org/D19871 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
