flx added a comment. In http://reviews.llvm.org/D19849#419751, @aaron.ballman wrote:
> I'm not opposed to showing the name, but I'm not certain I understand under > what circumstances the name would be useful. Since this is triggering on move > constructors, and move constructors can only have one parameter, the name > seems wholly redundant, isn't it? The case this is covering is when a value parameter can be moved, of which there can be many. http://reviews.llvm.org/D19849 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
