zequanwu added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/CoverageMapping/deferred-region.cpp:43
if (true)
- return; // CHECK: Gap,File 0, [[@LINE]]:11
+ return;
else
----------------
vsk wrote:
> I'm confused by this change. Do we lose the gap here? I assumed it was needed
> to prevent the condition count from `if (true)` from kicking in after the
> `return`?
Fixed.
================
Comment at: clang/test/CoverageMapping/switch.cpp:62
default: // CHECK-NEXT: File 0, [[@LINE]]:3 -> [[@LINE+1]]:10 = #4
break; // CHECK-NEXT: Branch,File 0, [[@LINE-1]]:3 ->
[[@LINE-1]]:10 = #4, (#0 - #4)
+ }
----------------
vsk wrote:
> The blank space after `default: break;` and before the closing '}' should
> have the same count as the switch condition, I thought (this goes for all of
> the unreachable code within a switch body)? The idea is to prevent
> 'not-executed' regions from appearing after the `break` stmt.
Yes, they are unreachable. So, shouldn't they always have zero count instead of
same count as switch condition?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D97101/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D97101
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
