aaronpuchert added a comment.

In D88220#2581538 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D88220#2581538>, @aaron.ballman 
wrote:

> We usually rely on the release notes to say something, but we didn't do that 
> here.

Perhaps @nullptr.cpp could add something there? The file is 
`clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst`.

> As for using `-Woption-ignored`... I am not certain we want it directly under 
> that flag, but it may make sense as a subgroup of `-Woption-ignored`. e.g., I 
> can imagine a use case where someone wants to silence that they're using a 
> deprecated flag (so their -Wx builds continue to compile) but still wants to 
> be warned when they use a option that's ignored for other reasons.

You're right, the other flags `-Woption-ignored` warns about seem to have an 
effect on compilation such that one might want to be warned if they're ignored. 
Which isn't the case here, I guess.

Also it's probably Ok if people just see that the warning no longer exists and 
then remove it, or remove it based on the compiler version.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D88220/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D88220

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to