[Sebastian Redl] > I rail against this warning here: > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18979503/why-locally-defined-struct-in-function-need-assignment-operator-copy-construct/18979812#18979812 > It's not just that the warning is silly, it's also a level 1 warning, which > is extra-silly. (MSVC's silly warnings are usually level 4.)
Agreed. I've filed VSO#217735 "warning C4822 "local class member function does not have a body" is annoying and pointless, especially at level 1" in our internal database, recommending that the warning should be removed outright. Thanks, STL _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
