MaskRay added a comment. In D90457#2551698 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D90457#2551698>, @tbaeder wrote:
> Hey @MaskRay, have you thought about this some more? Or is it too much magic > and you'd rather reject it altogether? Yes, it should be rejected. I've seen cases where people want `clang -c a.bc` to produce an object file instead of enabling LTO. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D90457/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D90457 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
