vsavchenko added a comment. In D95877#2547303 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D95877#2547303>, @RedDocMD wrote:
> @vsavchenko are there some more changes you want done? I think we had a bit of misunderstanding about the test. It still should pass (we can't have broken tests, it will disrupt CI bots). Try to put the test case, so it is THERE and you CHANGE the expected outcome when the analyzer behaves correctly. Right now, as I see above, the test crashes. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D95877/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D95877 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
