rnk added a comment. In D82862#2512908 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D82862#2512908>, @uweigand wrote:
> So why do you want GNU inline asm for clang-cl anyway? I thought the whole > point of clang-cl was to be compatible with the Microsoft Visual Studio > compiler, which I understand only supports the MS asm syntax? We have users, in this case, I think it's V8, who would prefer to use gcc-style module level assembly if it is available. Their motivation is somewhat arbitrary, but generally, clang-cl supports a variety of extensions, some inherited from GCC, in all modes. Part of the point of switching compilers from MSVC to clang is to get access to those extensions. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D82862/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D82862 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
