SjoerdMeijer added a comment. In D94779#2504519 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D94779#2504519>, @malharJ wrote:
> I had a look at the Clang Language Extension > <https://clang.llvm.org/docs/LanguageExtensions.html#extensions-for-loop-hint-optimizations> > ... and I saw this: > >> Specifying a width/count of 1 disables the optimization, and is equivalent >> to vectorize(disable) or interleave(disable). Ah yes, thanks. I think we should improve the langref spec also, this should be described in the same paragraph, not floating below some example. With this cleared up, I agree with Florian, ignoring things isn't great. But this brings me back to my question earlier: what is the problem with the current behaviour (i.e. not ignoring/handling it)? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D94779/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D94779 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
