HazardyKnusperkeks added a comment. In D92257#2497535 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D92257#2497535>, @MyDeveloperDay wrote:
> My assumption is that you want to stick with the minimum and maximum is that > correct? Otherwise I have to make a breaking change, or not achieve at all what I want. So either abandon this or we need a minimum and maximum. Although right now I have changed an existing test because in that case the behavior changed (as noted inline) and a test case still to decide how to advance. If that little break is not acceptable I see no further base to pursue this and have to decide to drop it totally or only apply it locally. And thanks for bringing this up again, currently I have very little time to work on clang-format and only react on the mails. Even while I have many things I want to add/change or cases where it is currently misformatted. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D92257/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D92257 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
