sscalpone added a comment. @awarzynski, perhaps I am being too dramatic by wondering if we are compromising support for one or the other language in order to support a common definition. In the case of -I, there are language-specific semantics that are important and interesting, such as the relationship in clang between -I and -isystem, and the relationship in flang between -I and -module. Maybe the right answer is to allow the definition of duplicate options that are differentiated by language?
+1 @andreil99 Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D94169/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D94169 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
