dblaikie added a comment.

In D94019#2478047 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D94019#2478047>, @hoy wrote:
> In D94019#2478045 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D94019#2478045>, @dblaikie wrote:
>
>> Please add a clang test for this.
>
> There is the original clang test `unique-internal-linkage-names.cpp` that 
> still works with the change here. What kind of new test would you like?

Something that tests this change (something that would fail before this patch 
is applied, and passes afterwards - demonstrating the change in behavior). 
Either something like the LLVM test, testing the pass sequence, or something 
with very simple IR (something that can robustly demonstrate the change in 
optimization behavior due to this patch and will be resilient to as many other 
changes to LLVM as possible (ie: something that captures the essence of this 
change)).


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D94019/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D94019

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to