lebedev.ri added a comment. In D76572#2472256 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D76572#2472256>, @Quuxplusone wrote:
> In D76572#2472221 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D76572#2472221>, @lebedev.ri > wrote: > >> Do you plan to follow-up with the diagnostic itself, in some form? > > No, I don't. My diagnostic code was just an ad-hoc noisy hack with no hope of > ever passing Clang's test suite. Huh. > But @oneraynyday's D89765 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D89765> will be of > interest to you. Personally, i don't think that patch has hope of being upstreamed in it's current form, introducing a new tool is directly counter-productive for usefulness/user adoption. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D76572/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D76572 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
