vabridgers added inline comments.

================
Comment at: clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PlistDiagnostics.cpp:1241
           if (TheTok.getIdentifierInfo() == VariadicParamII) {
-            TStream.injectRange(PrevParamMap.at(VariadicParamII));
+            if (PrevParamMap.find(VariadicParamII) != PrevParamMap.end())
+              TStream.injectRange(PrevParamMap.at(VariadicParamII));
----------------
steakhal wrote:
> Btw this lookup supposed to be successful. Always. Which suggests me that 
> there are even more logic bug lurking there.
> Without using 'at' here we wouldn't notice it, which is lucky.
If we keep the at(), maybe it's worthwhile adding an assert for the key 
present? 


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D93787/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D93787

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to