vabridgers added inline comments.
================ Comment at: clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PlistDiagnostics.cpp:1241 if (TheTok.getIdentifierInfo() == VariadicParamII) { - TStream.injectRange(PrevParamMap.at(VariadicParamII)); + if (PrevParamMap.find(VariadicParamII) != PrevParamMap.end()) + TStream.injectRange(PrevParamMap.at(VariadicParamII)); ---------------- steakhal wrote: > Btw this lookup supposed to be successful. Always. Which suggests me that > there are even more logic bug lurking there. > Without using 'at' here we wouldn't notice it, which is lucky. If we keep the at(), maybe it's worthwhile adding an assert for the key present? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D93787/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D93787 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits