vabridgers added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PlistDiagnostics.cpp:1241
if (TheTok.getIdentifierInfo() == VariadicParamII) {
- TStream.injectRange(PrevParamMap.at(VariadicParamII));
+ if (PrevParamMap.find(VariadicParamII) != PrevParamMap.end())
+ TStream.injectRange(PrevParamMap.at(VariadicParamII));
----------------
steakhal wrote:
> Btw this lookup supposed to be successful. Always. Which suggests me that
> there are even more logic bug lurking there.
> Without using 'at' here we wouldn't notice it, which is lucky.
If we keep the at(), maybe it's worthwhile adding an assert for the key
present?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D93787/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D93787
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
