NoQ added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/test/Analysis/concrete-endian.cpp:49
+#elif defined(__BIG_ENDIAN__)
+ clang_analyzer_eval(pps[3] == 0x8877); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
+ clang_analyzer_eval(pps[2] == 0xaa99); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
----------------
NoQ wrote:
> I suspect that exactly one of `pps[0]` in the little endian case or `pps[3]`
> in the big endian case should be `0x7788` instead. Like, they're in the
> opposite order, right?
Wait, loads are also in the opposite order. Nvm. Your code is correct and looks
like there's indeed a nice and succint way to do that.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D93595/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D93595
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
