rnk added inline comments.
================
Comment at: tools/driver/driver.cpp:350
@@ +349,3 @@
+ for (const char *F : argv) {
+ if (strcmp(F, "--rsp-quoting=posix") == 0)
+ RSPQuoting = POSIX;
----------------
thakis wrote:
> rnk wrote:
> > Should we call it "posix" or "gnu"? The reference implementation we are
> > trying to match is part of libiberty, which is why I called the tokenizer
> > TokenizeGNUCommandLine.
> I figured the reference implementation tries to implement
> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/xcu_chap02.html from
> posix, but I don't care much about the name. If you prefer gnu, I'm happy to
> use gnu. (In the same vein: Do you have an opinion on "windows" vs "cl" vs
> "msvc"?)
I buy that reasoning, let's use "posix" then.
I also like "windows" for the other style. The algorithm documented at
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/17w5ykft(v=vs.85).aspx is pretty
standard. New versions of mingw use the exact same algorithm.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D19425
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
