sammccall added a comment. In D92041#2448176 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D92041#2448176>, @xndcn wrote:
> In D92041#2446366 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D92041#2446366>, @sammccall wrote: > >> Sorry for the delay here. Kadir is out on vacation. >> >> Yikes - it's a shame reusing our existing type printing doesn't do the right >> thing, but injected-classname and partial specializations are indeed weird. >> I'm tempted to say just to live with the "type-parameter-0-0" nonsense >> rather than implement the workaround, but it's up to you. > > Got it, thanks. > The weird string only happens in injected-classname and partial > specialization, maybe we can add a PrintPolicy so that TypePrinter can handle > this case? I have tried to extract template arguments by casting the > injected-class to `ClassTemplatePartialSpecializationDecl`, and it seems work > well. Oh, I forgot... we added `declaredType()` in AST.h - you pass in a TypeDecl and get out a `QualType`... but it should handle CTPSDecl correctly. So something like: Pointee = Thisexpr->getpointeetype ClassDecl = Pointee->getAsTagDecl ClassType = declaredType(ClassDecl) PrettyThisType = ASTContext.getPointerType(QualType(ClassType.getTypePtr(), Pointee.getCVQualifiers())); then render PrettyThisType? CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D92041/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D92041 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
