curdeius requested changes to this revision.
curdeius added a comment.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.

I agree with @MyDeveloperDay that the existing tests should not be altered.



================
Comment at: clang/docs/ClangFormatStyleOptions.rst:1473
 
-**ConstructorInitializerAllOnOneLineOrOnePerLine** (``bool``)
-  If the constructor initializers don't fit on a line, put each
-  initializer on its own line.
+**ConstructorInitializer** (``ConstructorInitializerKind``)
+  Formatting of the constructor initializer.
----------------
MyDeveloperDay wrote:
> We can't easily remove an option once its been released, I know you have code 
> to handle it, but I think it needs to remain in the documentation and hence 
> the Format.h and somehow be marked deprecated otherwise someone is going to 
> look at the documentation and say, I could of sworn I used to be able to use 
> this setting...
I agree that `ConstructorInitializerAllOnOneLineOrOnePerLine` should be kept 
for backwards compatibility and translated to the new option 
`ConstructorInitializer`: `true` -> `BinPack` (`BestFit`) and `false` -> 
`Compact`, as it is done for example with 
`AlwaysBreakAfterDefinitionReturnType`.


================
Comment at: clang/docs/ClangFormatStyleOptions.rst:1481-1483
+  * ``CI_BestFit`` (in configuration: ``BestFit``)
+    Eiter all initializers are on a single line (it this fits),
+    otherwise every initializer has its own line.
----------------
Shouldn't that be called something like `BinPack` to match existing options 
(`BinPackArguments`, `BinPackParameters`)?


================
Comment at: clang/docs/ClangFormatStyleOptions.rst:1489-1500
     true:
     SomeClass::Constructor()
         : aaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaa), aaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaa), 
aaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa) {
       return 0;
     }
 
     false:
----------------
Please modify examples.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D90232/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D90232

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
  • [PATCH] D90232: [clang-form... MyDeveloperDay via Phabricator via cfe-commits
    • [PATCH] D90232: [clang... Marek Kurdej via Phabricator via cfe-commits

Reply via email to