martong marked an inline comment as done.
martong added a comment.

> I was thinking about to create a separate ASTImporter implementation 
> specifically for CTU and LLDB could have it's own implementation. For that we 
> just need to create an interface class with virtual functions.

One implementation could reside in libCrossTU and the other in LLDB. At least, 
that's what I thought. Unfortunately there is an obstacle which renders this 
whole idea practically unfeasible: Currently ASTImporter and ASTNodeImporter 
are `friend`s of almost all AST classes.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D92209/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D92209

_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to